|
|
@@ -284,12 +284,16 @@ mean burst length in packets. First-attempt success for the whole handshake with
|
|
|
| phase 1 (2, 2) no FEC | 5% | 81.4% | 85.6% | 87.9% | 89.0% |
|
|
|
| phase 1 (2, 2) FEC | 5% | 99.9% | 99.4% | 99.3% | 98.6% |
|
|
|
| phase 1 (2, 2) FEC | 10% | 99.3% | 97.5% | 97.4% | 96.3% |
|
|
|
-| phase 2 (7, 9, 2) no FEC | 5% | 39.8% | 57.5% | 70.4% | 77.7% |
|
|
|
-| phase 2 (7, 9, 2) FEC | 5% | 99.6% | 94.2% | 90.4% | 88.8% |
|
|
|
-| phase 2 (7, 9, 2) FEC | 10% | 95.9% | 84.6% | 79.0% | 77.3% |
|
|
|
+| phase 2 (8, 9, 2) no FEC | 5% | 37.8% | 56.0% | 69.3% | 77.1% |
|
|
|
+| phase 2 (8, 9, 2) FEC | 5% | 99.6% | 93.7% | 89.9% | 88.4% |
|
|
|
+| phase 2 (8, 9, 2) FEC | 10% | 95.3% | 83.5% | 77.9% | 76.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
With fresh repair symbols, phase 2 completes within two attempts at least 99.1% of the time
|
|
|
-in every scenario above, and within three at least 99.99%.
|
|
|
+in every scenario above, and within three at least 99.98%.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The simulators and their outputs are in [pq-handshake-sim](pq-handshake-sim/README.md),
|
|
|
+including a comparison with classical handshakes and a model of time to a working tunnel
|
|
|
+under Nebula's retry schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Prior art
|
|
|
|
JackDoan